The Supreme Court ruled today in two cases that could have a major impact on how social media platforms operate and how the government can interfere on behalf of political speech on these platforms.

Immediately after Charlie Kirk was shot during a college event in Utah, graphic video of what happened was available almost ...

Two state laws from Texas and Florida, that could upend the way social media companies handle content moderation are still up in the air. The Supreme Court sent the challenges back to lower courts, ...

The Supreme Court expressed strong concerns on Monday about the sweep of state laws restricting how large social media companies moderate user content, a digital free speech case with implications in ...

Following the tragic shooting of Charlie Kirk, graphic videos rapidly spread across social media platforms like X, YouTube, ...

Whether users wanted to see them or not, videos of horrific moments have been flooding social media feeds over the past week, ...

The circulation of horrific video footage after two killings has once again raised questions about how sites handle offending ...

One of former Missouri Attorney General Andrew Bailey's headline-grabbing actions -- a rule that would have required social ...

Social media platforms commonly use artificial intelligence for content moderation, with the AI software itself relying on algorithms to screen content posted by social media users. Ultimately, the AI ...

TikTok is putting hundreds of jobs in the UK which moderate content that appears on the social media platform at risk.

Graphic videos of conservative activist Charlie Kirk’s assassination continued to spread across social media platforms ...